- 911勛圖
- Events
- Inquiry Support
- Workshops & Programs
- SoTL 101: Introduction to SoTL and Teaching + Learning Inquiry
- SoTL 102: Formulating an Inquiry Project
- SoTL Thoughts
- Coffee + Conversation
- Tools for Inquiry: Conducting Inquiry Using CES
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Decolonial Teaching + Learning Seminar Series
- Decolonizing and Indigenizing Curricula
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning: Supporting Learning in Online Environments
- Open Education Grant Pilot Program
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Project Archive
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom Projects
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Scholarship of Teaching + Learning Projects
- Conferences & Calls for Proposals
- FLO Workshop: GenAI and the Indigenous 5Rs Framework [June 16, 2026]
- Cfp: 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [Deadline: June 29, 2026]
- Graduate Students/Post-docs Teaching in Higher Education Conference [August 07, 2026]
- 2026 DPI Conference [August 18-20, 2026]
- 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [October 01-02, 2026]
- 2026 SoTL Symposium Conference [October 22-24, 2026]
- For Research Personnel
- News + Stories
- AI as learning coach: project explores ChatGPT integration beyond plagiarism concerns
- Investigating the motivations and perceptions of undergraduate students using AI for assignments
- Faculty teaching confidence soars through peer observation program
- Research proves role plays work: evidence-based approach transforms history and labour studies teaching
- Welcome Kaitlyn Watson!
- Authentic learning transforms large epidemiology course: students find personal meaning in public health research
- Developing AI-resistant teaching through story-centered approach
- Life-changing plant course reveals how to help students see the green world around them
- Strategic repetition transforms mobile computing education: students master challenging topics through distributed practice
- Beyond grades: Ungraded portfolios transform teacher education
Testing and Evaluation of Redesigned First Year Physics Lab Courses
Grant program: Teaching and Learning Development Grant (TLDG)
Grant recipient: Barbara Frisken, Department of Physics
Project team: Daria Ahrensmeier, Teaching and Learning Centre Educational Consultant
Timeframe: May 2015 to August 2016
Support provided: $5,000 for 18 students to test labs, plus assistance with proposal development
Courses addressed:
- PHYS 132 Physics Laboratory I
- PHYS 133 Physics Laboratory II
Final report: View Barbara Frisken's final report (PDF) and conference presentation (PDF)
Interim report: View Barbara Frisken's interim report (PDF)
Description: We have designed new labs based on physics education research and experience at various institutions. We have developed a set of design principles aligned with learning goals that we hope will be of benefit to students. We need to make sure that the tasks are achievable by the average student but also stimulate and challenge all students. Before full implementation with a large class, we need to run tests with typical students in order to refine and improve the lab materials. We also wish to do some investigation of student learning to evaluate the effectiveness of our approach. We will to do this as a two-phase project. The first phase will focus on the first-semester labs (PHYS 132) and the second phase will focus on the second-semester labs (PHYS 133).
Questions addressed:
- What are the students initial views on measurement, data analysis and experiment design?
- Do the students perform the labs as intended?
- Do the students struggle with particular sections?
- What are the students final views on measurement, data analysis and experiment design?
- Are the labs stimulating? Challenging? Instructive?
Knowledge sharing: We will present our results to local colleagues. We have a team working on the redesign of the first year labs who will be following this closely. We also hope to share our results at an annual Symposium for Teaching and Learning at 911勛圖. Past experience has shown that other groups are interested in our work on re-structuring first year labs. Also, improving the first year lab experience is seen as a key component to attracting and retaining physics students.
Ahrensmeier, D., Frisken, B., Johnson, S., & McGuirk, J. (2016, June). How redesigning our first-year labs grew into a Gesamtkunstwerk in Physics Education. Presentation at the 2016 Canadian Association of Physicists (CAP) Congress, Ottawa, ON.
Frisken, B. (2016, May). Restructuring the first-year physics labs at 911勛圖. Presentation at the British Columbia Association of Physics Teachers Conference, Vancouver Community College,Vancouver, BC.