- 911³Ô¹Ï
- Events
- Inquiry Support
- Workshops & Programs
- SoTL 101: Introduction to SoTL and Teaching + Learning Inquiry
- SoTL 102: Formulating an Inquiry Project
- SoTL Thoughts
- Coffee + Conversation
- Tools for Inquiry: Conducting Inquiry Using CES
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Decolonial Teaching + Learning Seminar Series
- Decolonizing and Indigenizing Curricula
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning: Supporting Learning in Online Environments
- Open Education Grant Pilot Program
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Project Archive
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom Projects
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Scholarship of Teaching + Learning Projects
- Conferences & Calls for Proposals
- FLO Workshop: GenAI and the Indigenous 5Rs Framework [June 16, 2026]
- Cfp: 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [Deadline: June 29, 2026]
- Graduate Students/Post-docs Teaching in Higher Education Conference [August 07, 2026]
- 2026 DPI Conference [August 18-20, 2026]
- 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [October 01-02, 2026]
- 2026 SoTL Symposium Conference [October 22-24, 2026]
- For Research Personnel
- News + Stories
- AI as learning coach: project explores ChatGPT integration beyond plagiarism concerns
- Investigating the motivations and perceptions of undergraduate students using AI for assignments
- Faculty teaching confidence soars through peer observation program
- Research proves role plays work: evidence-based approach transforms history and labour studies teaching
- Welcome Kaitlyn Watson!
- Authentic learning transforms large epidemiology course: students find personal meaning in public health research
- Developing AI-resistant teaching through story-centered approach
- Life-changing plant course reveals how to help students see the green world around them
- Strategic repetition transforms mobile computing education: students master challenging topics through distributed practice
- Beyond grades: Ungraded portfolios transform teacher education
Graduate Student Perceptions of Academic Misconduct in the Business Classroom
Grant program: Teaching and Learning Development Grant (TLDG)
Grant recipient: Andrew Flostrand, Beedie School of Business
Project team: Sarah Lord Ferguson, research assistant
Timeframe: November 2018 to June 2019
Funding: $6000
Courses addressed:
- BUS 702 – Marketing Management
- BUS 752 – Strategic Management of Technology-Based Firms
- BUS 756 – Strategic Use of Information and Knowledge
- BUS 803 – Financial Econometrics
Final report: View Andrew Flostrand's final report (PDF)
Description: This study builds on a previous teaching and learning development grant study (insert link) that was designed to survey undergraduate students on academic dishonesty. This study extends our work to graduate students in order to determine if student perceptions of academic dishonesty are similar or different when compared with the undergraduate sample.
Questions addressed:
- What are graduate business student’s attitudes towards academic dishonesty? Specifically, how do students rate various scenarios illustrating academic dishonesty on a scale from ethical to unethical.
- What do students view as the most common examples of academic dishonestly occurring in the business classroom?
- What reasoning leads to students engaging in dishonest behaviour and what are some forms they are aware of?
- What do students view as the most important activities that the university should engage in to address academic dishonesty?
- Are students aware of 911³Ô¹Ï’s policy on academic integrity?
Knowledge sharing: The research findings were discussed informally with colleagues at the Beedie School of Business. The findings have not been published or presented at a conference to date, however, we look forward to doing so in the future.
Keywords: Academic dishonesty, student survey, focus groups, cheating, plagiarism, university policies