- 911勛圖
- Events
- Inquiry Support
- Workshops & Programs
- SoTL 101: Introduction to SoTL and Teaching + Learning Inquiry
- SoTL 102: Formulating an Inquiry Project
- SoTL Thoughts
- Coffee + Conversation
- Tools for Inquiry: Conducting Inquiry Using CES
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Decolonial Teaching + Learning Seminar Series
- Decolonizing and Indigenizing Curricula
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning: Supporting Learning in Online Environments
- Open Education Grant Pilot Program
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Project Archive
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom Projects
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Beedie
- EDUC
- FAS
- FHS
- Health Sciences: Mark Lechner
- Health Sciences: Laurie Goldsmith
- Health Sciences: Tim Takaro
- Health Sciences: Tim Takaro
- Health Sciences: Maya Gislason
- Health Sciences: Nienke van Houten
- Health Sciences: Denise Zabkiewicz
- Health Sciences: Mark Lechner
- Health Sciences: Maya Gislason
- Health Sciences: Tun Myint
- Health Sciences: Paola Ardiles
- Health Sciences: Diego Silva
- Health Sciences: Ruth Lavergne
- Health Sciences: Tun Myint
- Health Sciences: Nienke van Houten
- Health Sciences: Shira Goldenberg
- Health Sciences: Susan Erikson
- Health Sciences: Paola Ardiles
- Health Sciences: Angela Kaida
- Library
- Scholarship of Teaching + Learning Projects
- Conferences & Calls for Proposals
- 2026 UCalgary Conference on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching [Deadline: April 19, 2026]
- BCCampus: Introduction to Offline GenAI [April 20, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: April 20, 2026 [April 20-29, 2026]
- FLO MicroCourse: AI-Resilient Assessment Design Sprint [April 27 - May 1, 2026]
- Faculty Experiences with Open Pedagogy and Social Justice [April 30, 2026]
- Cfp: 2026 SoTL Symposium [Deadline: May 04, 2026]
- Graduate Students in Teaching Conference 2026 [May 05-06, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: May 5, 2026 [May 05-14, 2026]
- 3rd Annual Thompson-Okanagan Teaching and Learning Conference [May 13-14, 2026]
- SoTL Canada Journal Club: Developing a SoTL Identity [May 19, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: May 19, 2026 [May 19-28, 2026]
- 2026 Annual STLHE/SAPES Conference [Deadline: May 25, 2026]
- ETUG Spring 2026 Workshop: Collaboration, Co-creation, and Creativity in EdTech [May 28-29, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: June 1, 2026 [June 01-10, 2026]
- 2026 DPI Conference [August 18-20, 2026]
- 2026 SoTL Symposium Conference [October 22-24, 2026]
- For Research Personnel
- News + Stories
Student Response to Instructor Feedback on Writing
Grant program: Teaching and Learning Development Grant (TLDG)
Grant recipient: Marti Sevier, English for Academic Success/Department of Linguistics
Project team: Elaine Yanlin Zhang, research assistant
Timeframe: May 2012 to May 2013
Funding: $2,950
Final report: View Marti Sevier's final report (PDF)
From the final report: "The focus in this study has been on student attitude toward feedback, and it has been determined that, in this small group of learners, attitude is also extremely complex." Read more >>
Description: I plan to address the problem of why students enrolled in Canada and the World: Global Issues, which is part of the Preparation in Academic Skills (PAS) program, do not apply instructor feedback in their writing. The problem is important because a positive response to feedback should result in improved writing. I hope to find ways to make my feedback clear(er) to students and to incorporate systems which will require students to apply feedback received on writing tasks to subsequent writing tasks.
The students I will be working with are international students with a relatively low level of English proficiency (the entry requirement is IELTS 4, defined as "basic competence limited to familiar situations. Has frequent problems in understanding and expression. Is not able to use complex language by the International English Language Testing System). Their academic goal is admission to Fraser International College. The writing tasks that I intend to work on come from their e-journal assignments. Given that these are primarily short summary assignments belonging to a single genre, students should be able to apply the feedback they receive to subsequent assignments even if they do not rewrite the critiqued assignments.
The desired learning outcomes are that students will learn how to apply feedback and ultimately will internalize the feedback so that their writing in future courses will be more effective in terms of proper grammar usage, appropriate use of vocabulary, improved organization and development of ideas, and better understanding of the genre requirements.
Questions addressed: The main question for consideration is "Do students apply instructor feedback to their writing assignments? If not, why not?" In addition, there are several sub-questions:
- How well do students understand the feedback they are given?
- What do students think about the feedback? (For example, do they consider it threatening/trivial/helpful?)
- How, if at all, do students use feedback? Does feedback result in improvement in writing?
- Will students feelings and attitudes to feedback change as a result of participating in this project?
Knowledge sharing: I will share my insights with other Preparation in Academic Skills instructors and will be happy to speak with others who are interested in the topic.
Sevier, M., & Zhang, E. (2014, May). Student response to instructor feedback: provocative or provoking? Poster session presented at the Symposium on Teaching and Learning: Provocative Pedagogy, 911勛圖, Burnaby, BC.