911³Ô¹Ï

Skip to content Skip to main navigation
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
SMS
Email
Copy

The 911³Ô¹Ï Demshot Challenge: What Happens When Students Take Democracy Into Their Own Hands

July 31, 2026

On April 10, 2026, a group of 911³Ô¹Ï students walked into the Halpern Centre at 911³Ô¹Ï Burnaby and pitched their best ideas to renew and strengthen democracy to a live panel of judges. The result was an inspiring showcase of the immense innovation, talent and creativity of 911³Ô¹Ï students from various disciplines and at different points in their academic career.

Judges and winning participants for the Demshot Challenge

The 911³Ô¹Ï Demshot Challenge, run by the Centre for Dialogue in collaboration with the 911³Ô¹Ï Community Engaged Research Initiative, the School for Public Policy, and the , is built on a simple but important premise: democratic systems are under real pressure right now, from AI-driven misinformation to declining public trust to deepening polarization, and young people are not just stakeholders in that problem; they are some of the people best-placed to offer solutions.

Think hackathon meets design lab meets TEDx showcase, but with democracy at the centre. Students spent months working through workshops on democratic theory, storytelling, pitching, and civic engagement before submitting their proposals and, if shortlisted, defending them in a Dragon's Den-style finale for more than $2,500 in prize money. What came out the other side was a cohort of students who had genuinely wrestled with hard problems and come back with real ideas.

The students pitched to a panel of five judges: Aftab Erfan (Executive Director, Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue), Stuart Poyntz (Scientific Director, 911³Ô¹Ï's Community Engaged Research Initiative), Prem Sylvester (Project Co-Lead, Digital Democracies Institute), Claire Adams (Senior Analyst, Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue), and Kody Sider (Director of External Relations, 911³Ô¹Ï Graduate Student Society).

The winners were:

Tomos Land, winner of The Demshot Prize

The Demshot Prize: Tomos M Land

The top prize goes to Tomos M. Land, a Welsh graduate student in the Political Science department at 911³Ô¹Ï, for a project about something that often gets overlooked in conversations about democratic decline: the death of local news.

Tomos's argument is that the collapse of local journalism is not just an industry problem. When community newspapers disappear and coverage centralizes into national media monopolies, something democratic dies too. Public trust erodes. Communities lose their shared factual ground. And, as Tomos found in his research, the parallels between media monopolization and the rise of far-right, anti-establishment movements across North America and Europe are hard to ignore.

His theory of change: fund local journalism, rebuild public trust, strengthen democracy. Simple in framing, genuinely hard in execution, which is exactly why he focused his proposal on two things that are often missing from existing initiatives like Canada's Local Journalism Initiative. Novel funding models that can actually sustain community outlets, and a clear apprenticeship pathway from secondary and post-secondary education into journalism careers, so that local reporting has a next generation to carry it forward.

The next step is bringing together the stakeholders who need to be in the room: journalism professionals, education policymakers, and government officials, with the goal of launching a targeted pilot in a specific community. A thoroughly researched, clearly argued proposal for one of the quietest and most consequential problems facing Canadian democracy today. Well deserved.

Social Cohesion and Belonging Award: Zahra Khan 

Project: The Commons

Zahra Khan, a Political Science Master's student at 911³Ô¹Ï, designed The Commons to close a real gap in online democratic participation: you can deliberate with others online, but you cannot do it while also accessing the real-time information that might actually shape your thinking.

The Commons brings those two things together, combining a space for deliberative decision-making on contested issues with a live repository of working papers and background information, plus a virtual town hall function connecting citizens directly with policymakers. The animating idea, drawn from Habermas, is that better-informed deliberation produces better democratic outcomes, and that a platform designed with genuine inclusion in mind can make that accessible to anyone, not just people who already feel confident in public debate.

Zahra is already thinking concretely about who she wants at those first town halls. 

The NEWSTRAL team pitching to the judges and audience

Information Integrity and Accessibility + People's Choice Awards: Mehdi Jahani and Hai Thu Le 

Project: NEWSTRAL

Mehdi Jahani (HCI Master's student at SIAT) and Hai Thu Le (Interactive Arts and Technology) picked up two prizes for a platform that does something genuinely clever: instead of helping you identify media bias, it helps you identify your own.

NEWSTRAL asks users to state their existing beliefs on a topic before reading any news coverage about it. The platform then aggregates reporting from multiple sources and maps it against what the user said, creating a "reflective mirror." The circuit-breaker moment, the pause between consuming and reacting, is the whole point. Grounded in research from 911³Ô¹Ï's Data and Dialogue Lab showing that people share content based on whether it confirms their beliefs rather than the strength of the evidence, this is a practical response to a well-documented problem. Next steps: a testable prototype and a lightweight LLM tool for breaking beliefs down into verifiable propositions.

Civic Space, Education and Rights Award: Aidan Gough, Lisa Kim, and Alexander Hodaly 

Project: Vote911³Ô¹Ï

Three former co-presidents of the 911³Ô¹Ï Political Science Student Union came to Demshot with a voter mobilization project and a key finding from their research: the biggest barrier to student voting is not apathy. It is friction.

Students are not against voting. They just do not know how to register, are not sure where to go, and cannot figure out how it fits into a packed schedule. Vote911³Ô¹Ï responds with a peer-led outreach model that meets students where they already are, combined with a novel academic incentive component, a small grade credit for voting, modelled on a real 911³Ô¹Ï precedent where a 1% participation incentive in Political Science courses dramatically increased survey response rates. The longer vision: voting is a habit, and habits formed early tend to stick. Their next step is a formal partnership proposal to the SFSS ahead of a municipal or federal election. 

Public Voice and Accountability Award: Sara Wilson 

Project: What If We Voted for What We Want?

Sara Wilson is a communications strategist, doctoral researcher in democratic participation, and someone with more than two decades of senior public interest work across BC government, Indigenous relations, and reconciliation. She came to Demshot with a proposal that reframes what elections are actually for.

The project is a policy-first voting prototype where voters rank the policies they want, parties are evaluated on how closely their platforms match those priorities, and the winner is publicly committed to delivering on them. It does not replace elections. It adds a layer of accountability that the current system simply does not require. The insight that sharpened the whole design: polarization is driven less by disagreement than by perceived exclusion. People disengage not because they lost, but because they feel erased by the outcome. Sara's next step is a low-stakes pilot in student governance or a municipal consultation, building on a proposal that already placed runner-up at a prior 911³Ô¹Ï competition and was submitted to the FSC Social Impact Challenge 2026.

bit x bit team

Tech & Technology Disruptors Award: bit x bit

Profile to come.

Congratulations to every student who took part in the 911³Ô¹Ï Demshot Challenge this year. Putting real thought into hard democratic problems, building something, and then defending it in front of a live panel takes guts. We are glad you took your shot.

Want less talk, more conversation? Sign up for dialogue in your inbox.

First Name: *
Last Name: *
Email: *

How would you like to engage with us?